the yahngorithm
12USC
Big Ten
@
Rutgers
Big Ten
Week 3 · 2026 · Sat, Sep 19, 2:30 PM CT · CBS · SHI Stadium
Market spreadUSC -24
Market total59.5
Model spreadUSC -19.8
Edge+4.2

Spread models

SP+efficiencymodel USC -19.8
market USC -24  ·  edge +4.2 (home)  ·  USC +17.6 vs RUTG -4.7 + 2.5 HFA
SRSscoring margin
no games played yet — empty in week 1, noisy through ~week 3
YahnSP+ + EPA + rostermodel USC -19.3
market USC -24  ·  edge +4.7 (home)  ·  USC +17.1 vs RUTG -5 + 2.7 HFA

The spread signal is SP+ only right now. Market is the consensus of 9 books. Positive edge = model likes Rutgers. Guide §2.

How the Yahn number is built — not a separate model
SP+ base+ EPA+ roster= rating
USC+17.6-0.50+17.1
RUTG-4.7-0.5+0.2-5

SP+ is the backbone. EPA nudges toward raw efficiency (weight grows through the season — near zero this early). Roster = talent + returning production + transfer-portal net, fading to zero by week 5. Venue home edge: 2.7 (2.7 base + altitude / hostile bump; SP+ and SRS use a flat 2.5). Weights un-calibrated.

Totals model

USC expected
36.5
3.5 pts/poss
RUTG expected
16.7
1.6 pts/poss
Model total
53.2
market 59.5 · 21 poss, average pace
Edge
-6.3
model leans under

Only SP+ feeds this. Totals are noisier than spreads — the model's biggest UNDER edges cluster on blowouts and are mostly artifacts. Trust it most on games with a spread inside ~14. Guide §3.

Situational flags

travelUSC2426 mi, 3hhurts USC
Home stadium is 1,200+ miles from the venue, or the body-clock timezone shift is 2+ hours. A documented small drag on the traveling team.
lookaheadUSCthen Oregonhurts USC
Decent team favored by 13+ this week, with a rivalry or tough opponent (within ~6) next week. Classic trap — fade this team / take the points.
bad spotUSCtravel + lookaheadhurts USC
Two or more situational negatives stacked on this team (e.g. a long trip on a short week, or a letdown spot after a long trip). Backtests ~57% ATS on the fade — a decision aid, not a lock. Take the points against this team.

Flags corroborate, they never drive a pick. A flag against a team the model already dislikes is a green light; against a team the model likes, it cancels out. Guide §5.

Team trends · 2026 season to date

USCRUTG
ATS overall1-2 33%0-2
ATS at home1-2 33%0-1
ATS on the road0-1
ATS as favorite1-2 33%0-1
ATS as underdog0-1
ATS after a win1-1
ATS after a loss0-1
W–L at home3-0 100%0-1
W–L on the road0-1
Over / Under2O–1U1O–1U

Amber = an outlier split (≥65% or ≤35% ATS on 8+ games). Trends are context, not a signal on their own.

Current lines

BookSpread (RUTG)Total
betmgm+24 -10859.5 -108
betonlineag+24 -11259.5 -110
betrivers+24.5 -11460.5 -113
betus+24 -11059.5 -110
bovada+24.5 -12059.5 -110
draftkings+23.5 -10259.5 -108
fanduel+23.5 -10259.5 -110
lowvig+24 -10859.5 -108
mybookieag+24 -11059.5 -110

Best RUTG number +24.5 · best USC number -23.5. Best over 59.5 · best under 60.5. Latest snapshot Sep 15, 8:01 AM. Odds shown where the source provides them (live pulls only). Spread is from RUTG's side.

Line movement

Showing the 5 most recent snapshots of 7.

Prediction market · Kalshi

USC93%
RUTG7%
Implied lineUSC -20
Volume34k
Open interest31k
Traded 24h5.3k

Kalshi's market prices RUTG to win 7% — about USC -20 vs the book's USC -24. 4.0-pt gap — the market rates RUTG higher than the book. Volume and open interest are total contracts on the game (each settles at $1), not a per-side split — they tell you how much to trust the price. Guide §9.

Showing the 5 most recent of 12 snapshots.

Weather

Forecast for the venue at kickoff time (nearest hour). Each row is a snapshot — expect it to firm up as the game nears; the timestamp is when that snapshot was taken.

Showing the 3 most recent of 5 readings.

Sustained wind ≥ 15 mph is the one weather factor that reliably moves a total (UNDER). Everything else is minor. Guide §4.

Injuries

No impact-player injuries listed. ESPN's CFB feed is thin — an empty report means "unknown," not "clean." Guide §4.

Picks

No pick logged. Most model disagreements never become picks — see guide §6 for the bar.

Decision support, not a guarantee. Read the interpretation guide.